Screener
MEAR vs HYDB
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.09% less per year.
- MEAR follows a active selection strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYDB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEAR and HYDB
Explore further