Screener
MEAR vs IWB
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
MEAR is a fixed income ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. MEAR charges 0.26% a year and IWB 0.15%.
- MEAR is a fixed income fund, while IWB is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MEAR follows a active selection strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB costs 0.11% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than MEAR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $48.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.01 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -34.60% |
Similar to MEAR and IWB
Explore further