Screener
MEAR vs SHV
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SHV costs 0.11% less per year.
- SHV is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEAR follows a active selection strategy; SHV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $20.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | 4.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -0.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEAR and SHV
Explore further