Screener
MEM vs MEMA
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF
Key differences
- MEM costs 0.06% less per year.
- MEM is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEM is classified as equity, while MEMA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MEM follows a active selection strategy; MEMA uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEM | MEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $12M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.06% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.59% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.10% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEM and MEMA
Explore further