Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMA vs EMOP

Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

MEMA

Man Active Emerging Markets Alternative ETF

Man Group PLC

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$12M

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

AllianceBernstein

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$1.9B

Key differences

  • EMOP costs 0.15% less per year.
  • EMOP is significantly larger than MEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEMA is classified as alternative, while EMOP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • MEMA follows a long short strategy; EMOP uses active selection.
  • EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMAEMOP
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.70%
Fund size (AUM)$12M$1.9B
Since20251995
Dividend yield1.64%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategylong shortactive selection
CAGR 1YN/AN/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y
Max drawdown-13.12%-12.87%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMA and EMOP