Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEM vs SPEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$53M

SPEM

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$17.3B

Key differences

  • SPEM costs 0.72% less per year.
  • SPEM is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEM follows a active selection strategy; SPEM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMSPEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$53M$17.3B
Since20222007
Dividend yield3.06%2.58%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+52.4%+30.3%
CAGR 3Y+23.2%+19.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.040.95
Volatility 1Y20.59%15.88%
Max drawdown-19.10%-36.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEM and SPEM