Screener
SPEM vs MEMX
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.72% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPEM follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPEM | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $45M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.88% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -36.06% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPEM and MEMX
Explore further