Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEM vs VWO

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF vs Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$53M

VWO

Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund

Vanguard

Annual cost

0.06%

Fund size

$159.9B

Key differences

  • VWO costs 0.73% less per year.
  • VWO is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEM follows a active selection strategy; VWO uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • VWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMVWO
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.06%
Fund size (AUM)$53M$159.9B
Since20222005
Dividend yield3.06%2.48%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+52.4%+27.1%
CAGR 3Y+23.2%+17.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.0%
Sharpe 3Y1.040.85
Volatility 1Y20.59%15.70%
Max drawdown-19.10%-36.39%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEM and VWO