Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs EEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • EEM costs 0.07% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEMX follows a active selection strategy; EEM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$28.1B
Since20232003
Dividend yield1.72%1.91%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+62.2%+46.1%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.0%
Sharpe 3Y1.201.00
Volatility 1Y21.07%19.54%
Max drawdown-19.27%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and EEM