Screener
MEMX vs REMG
Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.15% less per year.
- MEMX follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEMX | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.27% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEMX and REMG
Explore further