Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs SCHE

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

SCHE

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$12.3B

Key differences

  • SCHE costs 0.72% less per year.
  • SCHE is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MEMX follows a active selection strategy; SCHE uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SCHE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXSCHE
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$45M$12.3B
Since20232010
Dividend yield1.72%2.67%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+62.2%+26.2%
CAGR 3Y+25.6%+17.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+5.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.200.84
Volatility 1Y21.07%16.11%
Max drawdown-19.27%-36.16%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MEMX and SCHE