Screener
METL vs COPJ
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPJ costs 0.24% less per year.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; COPJ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | COPJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $162M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 11.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +125.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +43.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 41.67% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and COPJ
Explore further