Screener
METL vs SLVP
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.60% less per year.
- SLVP is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; SLVP uses index tracking.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $945M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +133.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +51.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 52.96% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and SLVP
Explore further