Screener
METL vs PICK
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Key differences
- PICK costs 0.60% less per year.
- PICK is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; PICK uses index tracking.
- PICK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +83.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 27.81% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -52.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and PICK
Explore further