Screener
METV vs BETZ
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
Key differences
- METV costs 0.16% less per year.
- METV is significantly larger than BETZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, METV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| METV | BETZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $51M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 4.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | -7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.94% | 20.37% |
| Max drawdown | -59.64% | -60.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METV and BETZ
Explore further