Screener
METV vs QDTE
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- METV costs 0.37% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than METV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METV is classified as equity, while QDTE is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- METV follows a index tracking strategy; QDTE uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| METV | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $828M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 45.82% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.1% | +42.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.94% | 14.95% |
| Max drawdown | -59.64% | -22.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METV and QDTE
Explore further