Screener
MFIG vs IWY
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.30% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $16.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and IWY
Explore further