Screener
MFIG vs QTJA
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.29% less per year.
- MFIG is classified as equity, while QTJA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MFIG follows a index tracking strategy; QTJA uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | QTJA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $17M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -36.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and QTJA
Explore further