Screener
MFIG vs RZG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RZG costs 0.15% less per year.
- RZG is significantly larger than MFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RZG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFIG | RZG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $121M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.69% |
| Max drawdown | -14.29% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFIG and RZG
Explore further