Screener
MFMO vs AAVM
Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF vs Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.12% less per year.
- AAVM is significantly larger than MFMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFMO follows a index tracking strategy; AAVM uses active selection.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFMO | AAVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $24M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +34.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -12.05% | -34.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFMO and AAVM
Explore further