Screener
MFSV vs DCOR
MFS Active Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.30% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFSV is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and DCOR
Explore further