Screener
MFSV vs FELG
MFS Active Value ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.26% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.31% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -23.89% |
Similar to MFSV and FELG
Explore further