Screener
MFSV vs IWD
MFS Active Value ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.26% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; IWD uses index tracking.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $74.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and IWD
Explore further