Screener
MFSV vs PY
MFS Active Value ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.29% less per year.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $212M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and PY
Explore further