Screener
MFVL vs TMFS
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFVL costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFS is significantly larger than MFVL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MFVL follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- TMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFVL | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $64M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.56% |
| Max drawdown | -7.03% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFVL and TMFS
Explore further