Screener
MID vs NULC
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- NULC costs 0.24% less per year.
- MID follows a active selection strategy; NULC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, NULC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MID | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $57M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.6% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.67% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.15% | -34.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MID and NULC
Explore further