Screener
MIDE vs EASG
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Key differences
- EASG is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MIDE covers north america markets; EASG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, MIDE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MIDE | EASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $67M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.95% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -24.59% | -32.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MIDE and EASG
Explore further