Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MIDE vs ESGD

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

MIDE

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF

Xtrackers

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$4M

ESGD

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$11.3B

Key differences

  • MIDE costs 0.05% less per year.
  • ESGD is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MIDE covers north america markets; ESGD covers global ex us.
  • ESGD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MIDEESGD
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$11.3B
Since20212016
Dividend yield1.37%3.39%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+26.9%+21.5%
CAGR 3Y+16.3%+15.5%
CAGR 5Y+7.8%+8.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.730.79
Volatility 1Y15.95%15.31%
Max drawdown-24.59%-33.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MIDE and ESGD