Screener
MIDE vs RFV
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- MIDE costs 0.20% less per year.
- RFV is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MIDE | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $313M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.01% | 18.26% |
| Max drawdown | -24.59% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MIDE and RFV
Explore further