Screener
MILN vs CHIQ
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- MILN costs 0.15% less per year.
- MILN covers north america markets; CHIQ covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, MILN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CHIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | CHIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $148M |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 1.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | -17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +3.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | -9.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 22.76% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -67.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and CHIQ
Explore further