Screener
MILN vs RSSL
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.42% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than MILN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MILN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 19.27% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and RSSL
Explore further