Screener
MILN vs RYLD
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- MILN costs 0.10% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than MILN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MILN is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MILN follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, MILN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and RYLD
Explore further