Screener
MINO vs PVI
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.14% less per year.
- MINO is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINO follows a active selection strategy; PVI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINO | PVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $623M | $31M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 2.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.7% | +2.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +2.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | -0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.74% | 2.62% |
| Max drawdown | -15.24% | -1.16% |
Similar to MINO and PVI
Explore further