Screener
PVI vs MUNI
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- MUNI is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVI follows a index tracking strategy; MUNI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MUNI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | MUNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 3.28% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.62% | 2.27% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -11.16% |
Similar to PVI and MUNI
Explore further