Screener
MINT vs BILZ
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- BILZ costs 0.22% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than BILZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINT | BILZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.5B | $874M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.27% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -4.62% | -0.52% |
Similar to MINT and BILZ
Explore further