Screener
MINT vs LDUR
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINT costs 0.18% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than LDUR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINT follows a active selection strategy; LDUR uses index tracking.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINT | LDUR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.5B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2009 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.60 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.27% | 1.56% |
| Max drawdown | -4.62% | -8.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINT and LDUR
Explore further