Screener
MINV vs EMSF
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
Key differences
- MINV is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINV covers asia pacific markets; EMSF covers emerging markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | EMSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $44M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 5.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +64.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 24.21% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -24.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and EMSF
Explore further