Screener
MINV vs MEMX
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- MINV is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINV covers asia pacific markets; MEMX covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $45M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and MEMX
Explore further