Screener
MINV vs MCH
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews China Active ETF
Key differences
- MINV is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MINV covers asia pacific markets; MCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $22M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 19.91% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -40.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and MCH
Explore further