Screener
MLPA vs ENFR
Global X MLP ETF vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.42% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than ENFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ENFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $460M |
| Since | 2012 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and ENFR
Explore further