Screener
MLPA vs IPAV
Global X MLP ETF vs Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- IPAV costs 0.22% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPA covers north america markets; IPAV covers global.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | IPAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $5M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 17.09% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -14.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and IPAV
Explore further