Screener
MLPA vs IXC
Global X MLP ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.37% less per year.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Since | 2012 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +20.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 18.71% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and IXC
Explore further