Screener
MLPA vs MLPR
Global X MLP ETF vs ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
Key differences
- MLPR costs 0.77% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than MLPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPA follows a index tracking strategy; MLPR uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $11M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 8.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | +30.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 20.56% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -48.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and MLPR
Explore further