Screener
MLPD vs EIPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
Key differences
- MLPD costs 0.35% less per year.
- EIPX is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPD follows a option income strategy; EIPX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPD | EIPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $532M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 2.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.34% | 11.12% |
| Max drawdown | -12.90% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPD and EIPX
Explore further