Screener
MLPD vs ENFR
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.25% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPD follows a option income strategy; ENFR uses index tracking.
- ENFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPD | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $460M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.34% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -12.90% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPD and ENFR
Explore further