Screener
MLPD vs IXC
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.20% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPD follows a option income strategy; IXC uses index tracking.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPD | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.34% | 18.71% |
| Max drawdown | -12.90% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPD and IXC
Explore further