Screener
MLPD vs PAVE
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.13% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than MLPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPD follows a option income strategy; PAVE uses index tracking.
- PAVE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPD | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.34% | 18.91% |
| Max drawdown | -12.90% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPD and PAVE
Explore further