Screener
PAVE vs MLPA
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- PAVE costs 0.30% less per year.
- PAVE is significantly larger than MLPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PAVE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PAVE | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $2.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.8% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.91% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -44.08% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PAVE and MLPA
Explore further