Screener
MLPX vs AMZA
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs InfraCap MLP ETF
Key differences
- MLPX costs 1.27% less per year.
- MLPX is significantly larger than AMZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPX follows a index tracking strategy; AMZA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPX | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 1.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $464M |
| Since | 2013 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.96% | 7.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.0% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.6% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.20% | 17.74% |
| Max drawdown | -64.62% | -86.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPX and AMZA
Explore further