Screener
MMLG vs FSGS
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.24% less per year.
- MMLG is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MMLG follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MMLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMLG | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $29M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.2% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.13% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -45.97% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMLG and FSGS
Explore further